If ever the critics were wrong about a movie, that movie is
Hancock. Before seeing this movie, I read many a review; many of them were
negative. But in the heap were gems, like the
Chicago Sun-Times,
Rolling Stone,
The New York Times.
I agree with this latter group.
Hancock is no ordinary superhero flick. It's packed with the action that you come to expect, but there's a level of depth here - and sheer acting force - that elevates this movie.
So here it is. John Hancock (Will Smith) is a layabout louse, cussing at children, destroying public and private property on his way to crimes-in-progress, being more of a hindrance than help to the city of Los Angeles. Then he meets Ray
Embrey (Jason
Bateman), a PR guy down on his luck.
Embrey offers to give Hancock a free image make-over. He introduces Hancock to his stunning wife , Mary (
Charlize Theron), and his son Aaron (Jae Head), Hancock's biggest fan, it seems.
Embrey convinces Hancock to accept responsibility for his actions, to submit to an arrest warrant for causing more than $7 million in damage to public property. In prison, Hancock literally shoves one guy's head up
another's ass. But here, Hancock also goes through a kind of transformation, and the film transcends the set-up that we're shown in the trailers.
I won' t reveal what happens next, because the surprise is half the fun. But I will tell you this: Theron and Smith bring the same depth of raw emotion that they do to their most affecting dramatic works. We start asking ourselves questions about the origin of superheros, the meaning of sacrifice, and the nature of love, even while marveling at the effects or the action on the screen.
I'll close with
The New Yorker: "We are watching genuine actors at work ... For the first time in his life, Will Smith
doesn’t flirt with the audience. He
doesn’t smile and tease and drawl; he stays in character as a self-hating lonely guy, and, in Berg’s closeups, the planes of his face seem massive, almost sculpted.
Charlize Theron ...
isn’t running away from her good looks anymore. Wearing a simple sleeveless red shift, her blond hair hanging around her shoulders, she’s a knockout in “Hancock,” and she gives the sexiest performance of her career."
Hancock is quite possibly the most enjoyable and heartfelt summer blockbuster!
There's this scene in Shoot 'Em Up in which Paul Giamatti, playing the bad guy, has barged into the boudoir of a lactating prostitute to inquire the whereabouts of Mr. Smith (Clive Owen) and the baby. He fires his pistol then places the searing metal against her thigh. When he fires off a couple of rounds and makes to put the gun against more sensitive flesh, Smith appears and the two face off, surrounded by colored bottles filled with the hooker's milk.
We've all seen the trailers, and we all agree: The Dark Knight looks like it is going to be a kick-ass movie. One of those rare sequels ala X-Men 2: X-Men United that completely dwarfs the original.
in their roles, and that the leading lady is Maggie Gyllenhaal, an actress with enough chops to match her leading man. That on film No. 2, this newest Batman franchise makes us forget about the earlier Batman movies.
If ever the critics were wrong about a movie, that movie is Hancock. Before seeing this movie, I read many a review; many of them were negative. But in the heap were gems, like the Chicago Sun-Times, Rolling Stone, The New York Times.
I agree with this latter group. Hancock is no ordinary superhero flick. It's packed with the action that you come to expect, but there's a level of depth here - and sheer acting force - that elevates this movie.
Confession: We still have not seen this movie, but we want to, and will, eventually. The early word is positive - 76 percent on Rotten Tomatoes. Entertainment Weekly says: "Wanted is kind of unintelligible and idiotic. Also kind of nasty and brutish. And also undeniably kind of fun." Our kind of movie.
The thing about this latest George Lucas - Steven Spielberg romp is it doesn't pretend to be what it is not. It ain't philosophy. It ain't deep drama. It's simply a good time. Old fashioned entertainment to be had with a Coke and buttered popcorn. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is movie-making nostalgia at it's finest, a homage to the old, Harrison Ford, and a passing of the torch to the new and young, Shia LeBeouf, who upstages the marquee star in every scene they share.
A friend and I have been talking about seeing Hancock since the trailer was released. We'd planned to see it on opening night. Then the reviews started to come in. And it seems the reviewers were not feeling Will Smith in his role as antihero. The movie got a 36% on Rotten Tomatoes. But individual reviewers have praised it -- including the New York Times, The New Yorker and the Chicago Sun-Times (which gave it 3 stars). I'm checking it out this weekend and will add my own opinion to the mix.
This post comes a little late, I know. And I also know that by now, I'm preaching to the choir. But Iron Man is a must see film for any lover of action/adventure/sci-fi. It packs the same kind of punch as the second in the X-Men series. And its funny-as-all-get-out. Robert Downey Jr. stars as Tony Stark (perfectly cast), and Gwyneth Paltrow is actually good here as his assistant, Pepper Pots. The man who steals the show, however, is Jeff Bridges as Obadiah Stane. Also appearing is Terrance Howard, who's in every other movie out in the last two years.
Finally, they got it right. The newest Incredible Hulk erases the horribly misguided Ang Lee cartoon of 2003. Starring Ed Norton and Liv Tyler in lead roles, the movie is action-packed but not lacking in heart. It skips the backstory that any self-respecting Hulk fan already knows and dives into the action of the day. There are a couple of interesting twists and cliffhanger enough to set up for a sequal.
Posts
